Teleworking

2.1  Teleworking Adoption and Frequency

  • “Teleworking Behavior Pre-, During, and Expected Post-COVID: Identification and Empirical Description of Trajectory Types”, by Xinyi Wang, Sung Hoo Kim, and Patricia Mokhtarian.  Travel Behaviour and Society 33, 100628, 2023. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2023.100628.
  • “Home-based Telecommuting and Intra-household Interactions in Work and Non-work Travel: A Seemingly Unrelated Censored Regression Approach”, by Seung-Nam Kim, Sangho Choo, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation Research Part A 80, 2015, 197-214.
  • “The Impact of the Residential Built Environment on Work at Home Adoption and Frequency:  An Example from Northern California“, by Wei Tang, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Susan L. Handy.  Journal of Transportation and Land Use 4(3)(Fall), 2011, 3-22.  Available at https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/76.
  • “On Modeling the Choices of Work-Hour Arrangement, Location and Frequency of Telecom­muting“, by Prasad Vana, Chandra Bhat, and Patricia Lyon Mokhtarian.  Paper no. 08-2290 presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, January 2008.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1620.
  • “Modeling the Joint Labor-Commute Engagement Decisions of San Francisco Bay Area Residents“, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. Chapter 25 in Hani S. Mahmassani, ed., Transportation and Traffic Theory: Flow, Dynamics, and Human Interaction. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd., 2005, pp. 487-506.  Abstract available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=1743.
  • “Telework Reflections”, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  In P. Jackson and B. Rapp, eds.  Organisation and Work Beyond 2000.  Berlin:  Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 153-155.
  • “Measuring the Measurable:  Why Can’t We Agree on the Number of Telecommuters in the US?“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, and Sangho Choo. Quality and Quantity 39, 2005, 423-452.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-6790-z or https://rdcu.be/dcJpj.
  • “Patterns of Telecommuting Engagement and Frequency:  A Cluster Analysis of Telecenter Users“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ravikumar Meenakshisundaram.  Prometheus 20(1), 2002, 21-37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08109020110110907.
  • “Worker Telecommunication and Mobility in Transition:  Consequences for Planning“, by Amy Helling and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Journal of Planning Literature 15(4) (May), 2001, 511-525.  Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08854120122093168.
  • “Modeling Employees’ Perceptions and Proportional Preference of Work Locations:  The Regular Workplace and Telecommuting Alternatives“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Michael N. Bagley.  Transportation Research A 34(4), 2000, 223-242.  Reprinted as Chapter 23 in Transport and Information Systems, eds. Roger Stough, Yoshiro Higano, Kenneth Button, and Peter Nijkamp (Series on Classics in Transport Analysis, eds. Kenneth Button and Peter Nijkamp), Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2003, 348-367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00002-6.
  • “Duration and Frequency of Telecenter Use:  Once a Telecommuter, Always a Telecommuter?“, by Krishna V. Varma, Chaang-Iuan Ho, David M. Stanek, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation Research C 6(1/2), 1998, 47-68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(98)00007-2.
  • “Analyzing the Preference for Non-exclusive Forms of Telecommuting:  Modeling and Policy Implications“, by Michael N. Bagley and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation 24(3), 1997, 203-226. Available at https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924601411 or https://rdcu.be/dcJqP.
  • “Developing Models of Preference for Home-Based and Center-Based Telecommuting:  Fin­dings and Forecasts“, by David M. Stanek and Patricia L. Mokh­tarian.  Technological Forecasting and Social Change 57(1/2), 1998, 53-74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00070-X.
  • “The Impact of Gender, Occupation, and Presence of Children on Telecommuting Motivations and Constraints“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Michael N. Bagley, and Ilan Salomon.  Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49(12), Special Issue on Social Informatics, 1998, 1115-1134.  Available at https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%281998%2949%3A12%3C1115%3A%3AAID-ASI7%3E3.0.CO%3B2-Y.
  • “The Future of Telecommuting“, by Susan L. Handy and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Futures 28(3), 1996, 227-240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00003-1.
  • “Forecasting Telecommuting:  An Exploration of Methodologies and Research Needs“, by Susan L. Handy and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation 23, 1996, 163-190.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00170034 or https://rdcu.be/dcJrN.
  • “Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 3:  Identifying the Choice Set and Estimating Binary Choice Models for Technology-Based Alternatives“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon.  Environment and Planning A 28, 1996, 1877-1894.  Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/a281877.
  • “Modeling the Desire to Telecommute:  The Importance of Attitudinal Factors in Behavioral Models“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon.  Transportation Research A 31(1), 1997, 35-50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(96)00010-9.
  • “Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 2:  A Case of the Preferred Impossible Alternative“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon.  Environment and Planning A 28, 1996, 1859-1876.  Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/a281859.
  • “Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting Frequency in California:  An Exploratory Analysis“, by Jill S. Mannering and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Technological Forecasting and Social Change 49(1), 1995, 49-73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(95)00005-U.
  • “Planning for Telecommuting:  Measurement and Policy Issues“, by Susan L. Handy and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Journal of the American Planning Association 61(1) (Winter), 1995, 99-111.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975623.
  • “A Comparison of the Policy, Social, and Cultural Contexts for Telecommuting in Japan and the United States“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Koji Sato.  Social Science Computing Review 12(4) (Fall), 1994, 641-658.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/089443939401200412.
  • “Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting:  Setting the Context“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon.  Environment and Planning A 26(5), 1994, 749-766.  An abridged version also appears as “Factors in the Adoption of Telecommuting”, Chapter 3 in F. van Reisen and M. Tacken, eds., A Future of Telework:  Towards a New Urban Planning Concept, Netherlands Geographical Studies 189, 1995, 39-53.  https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1068/a260749.
  • “Telecommuting Frequency and Impacts for the State of California Pilot Project Participants“, by Piotr Olszewski and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Technological Forecasting and Social Change 45(2), 1994, 275-286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(94)90050-7.
  • “Defining Telecommuting“, by Patricia Lyon Mokhtarian, Transportation Research Record 1305, 1991, 273-281.  Expanded version available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=946.

——————————————————————————————————

  • “Factors Influencing Full-day, Part-day and Overtime Telecommuting: An Investigation of Northern California Workers Using Non-Mean-Centered Factor Scores to Segment on Built Environment Attitudes”, by Huijing Deng, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Giovanni Circella, 2015.   Available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/67q1r3bk.
  • “The Role of Neighborhood Characteristics in the Adoption and Frequency of Working at Home:  Empirical Evidence from Northern California“, by Wei Tang, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Susan L. Handy.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-08-21, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, July 2008.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1182.
  • “Don’t Work, Work at Home, or Commute? Discrete Choice Models of the Decision for San Francisco Bay Area Residents“, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-05-05, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, March 2005.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=47.
  • “Data and Measurement Issues in Transportation, with Telecommuting as a Case Study“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, and Sangho Choo.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-04-29, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, August 2004.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=191.
  • “Telecommuting Centers in California:  1991 – 1997“, by Carol Buckinger, Francisca Mar, Patricia Mokhtarian, and John Wright.  Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration and the Cali­for­nia Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-16, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, September 1997.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=546.
  • “Residential Area-Based Offices Project: Final Report on Telecenter Operations“, by Carol Buckinger, Francisca Mar, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-28, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, December 1997.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=557.
  • “Residential Area-Based Offices Project:  Final Report on the Evaluation of Impacts“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Chaang-Iuan Ho, Shun Hung, Toan Lam, Elizabeth Raney, Lothlorien Red­mond, David M. Stanek, and Krishna V. Varma.  Prepared for the Federal Highway Adminis­tra­tion and the California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-17, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, September 1997.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=547.
  • “Telecommuting Centers and Related Concepts:  A Review of Practice“, by Michael N. Bagley, Jill S. Mannering, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Prepared for the Federal Highway Adminis­tra­tion and the California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-94-03, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, March 1994.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=743.
  • “Technical Memo 1: Current Levels of Telecommuting in California“, by S. Handy and P. L. Mokhtarian, prepared for the California Energy Commission. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-93-14, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, August 1993.
  • “Technical Memo 3: Base Case Estimates and Forecasts of Telecommuting in California“, by S. Handy and P. L. Mokhtarian, prepared for the California Energy Commission. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-93-16, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, August 1993.
  • “Technical Memo 4: Future Levels of Telecommuting in California: Factors, Policies, Modeling Issues, and Research Needs“, by S. Handy and P. L. Mokhtarian, prepared for the California Energy Commission. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-93-17, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, August 1993.
  • “Binary and Multinomial Logit Models of the Preference for Center-Based Telecommuting“, by Michael N. Bagley. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-95-16, September 1995.
  • “Modeling Perceptions and Preference of Home-Based and Center-Based Telecommuting“, by David M. Stanek. Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UC Davis. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-95-12, December 1995.
  • “Adoption of Telecommuting in Two California State Agencies“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, Somitra Saxena, Srikanth Sampath, Peter Cheung, Kate Le, and Michael Bagley. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-96-05, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, July 1995.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=611.
  • “Modeling the Preference for Telecommuting: Measuring Attitudes and Other Variables“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-95-17, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, July 1995.  Abstract available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=677.
  • “The Influence of Gender and Occupation on Individual Perceptions of Telecommuting”, by Michael N. Bagley, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Ilan Salomon, and Lisa Hulse.  Chapter 37, pp. 689-712, in the Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Women’s Travel Issues, Baltimore, Maryland, October 23-25, 1996.  Publication No. FHWA-PL-97-024 of the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
  • “Why Don’t You Telecommute?“, by Ilan Salomon and Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Access 10 (a publication of the University of California Transportation Center), Spring, 1997, 27-29. Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=589.
  • “Telecommuting: A Handbook to Help You Set Up a Program at Your Company”, by E. Shirazi, J. Fink, J. Pratt, P. Mokhtarian, G. Gordon, P. Conroy, C. McKeever, D. Carter, and E. Schreffler, and Telecommuting: A Guide for Executives, by J. Pratt, P. Mokhtarian, G. Gordon, P. Conroy, D. Carter, E.Schreffler, and E. Shirazi. California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement, Sacramento, CA, September 1991.

2.2  Transportation/Air Quality Impacts of Teleworking

  • “Does Telecommuting Reduce Vehicle-miles Traveled?  An Aggregate Time Series Analysis for the U.S.“, by Sangho Choo, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Ilan Salomon.  Transportation 32(1), 2005, 37-64.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-004-3046-7 or https://rdcu.be/dcJuZ.
  • “A Space-Time Network for Telecommuting versus Commuting Decision-Making“, by Anna Nagurney, June Dong, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Papers in Regional Science 82, 2003, 451-473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10110-003-0119-5.
  • “The Impact of Telecommuting on the Activity Spaces of Participants and their Households“, by Somitra Saxena and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Geographical Analysis 29(2) (April), 1997, 124-144.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1997.tb00952.x.
  • “A Synthetic Approach to Estimating the Impacts of Telecommuting on Travel“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Urban Studies 35(2), 1998, 215-241.  Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/0042098984952.
  • “The Transportation Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting:  Interim Findings from the Neighborhood Telecenters Project“, by Prashant N. Balepur, Krishna V. Varma, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation 25(3), 1998, 287-306.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005048329523 or https://rdcu.be/dcJvF.
  • “Analyzing the Travel Behavior of Home-Based Workers in the 1991 Caltrans Statewide Travel Survey“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Dennis K. Henderson.  Journal of Transportation and Statistics 1(3), 1998, 25-41.  Available at https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/4718.
  • “The Transportation Impacts of Telecommuting:  Recent Empirical Findings“, by Patricia L. Mokh­tarian.  Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change, P. R. Stopher and M. Lee-Gosselin, eds., Pergamon (Elsevier Science Ltd.), Oxford, Great Britain, 1997, 91-106.
  • “The Tradeoff between Trips and Distance Traveled in Analyzing the Emissions Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Krishna V. Varma.  Transportation Research D 3(6), 1998, 419-428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00018-2.
  • “Impacts of Center-Based Telecommuting on Travel and Emissions:  Analysis of the Puget Sound Demonstration Project“, by Dennis K. Henderson and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. Transportation Research D 1(1), 1996, 29-45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(96)00009-0.
  • “The Travel and Emissions Impacts of Telecommuting for the State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project“, by Brett E. Koenig, Dennis K. Henderson, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Trans­por­tation Research C 4(1), 1996, 13-32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-090X(95)00020-J.
  • “Using Travel Diary Data to Estimate the Emissions Impacts of Transportation Strategies:  The Puget Sound Telecommuting Demonstration Project“, by Dennis K. Henderson, Brett E. Koenig, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association 46(1), 1996, 47-57.  https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467440.
  • “Methodological Issues in the Estimation of Travel, Energy, and Air Quality Impacts of Telecommuting“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Susan L. Handy, and Ilan Salomon.  Transpor­tation Research A 29A(4), 1995, 283-302.  Reprinted in The Environment and Transport, eds. Yoshitsugu Hayashi, Kenneth J. Button, and Peter Nijkamp, (Vol. 4 in series on Environmental Analysis and Economic Policy, eds. Kenneth Button and Peter Nijkamp), Cheltenham, UK:  Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 1999.  Reprinted as Chapter 25 inTransport and Information Systems, eds. Roger Stough, Yoshiro Higano, Kenneth Button, and Peter Nijkamp (Series on Classics in Transport Analysis, eds. Kenneth Button and Peter Nijkamp), Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2003, 388-407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)00029-A.
  • “The Effectiveness of Telecommuting as a Transportation Control Measure“, by S. Sampath, S. Saxena, and P. L. Mokhtarian.  Proceedings of the ASCE Urban Trans­por­ta­tion Division National Conference on Transportation Planning and Air Quality, Santa Barbara, CA, July 28-31, 1991 (?1992), 347-362.  Abstract available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=991.
  • “Telecommuting and Travel:  State of the Practice, State of the Art“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Transportation 18(4), 1991, 319-342. Reprinted in Transportation Planning (Classics in Planning series), eds. Yoram Shiftan, Kenneth Button, and Peter Nijkamp.  Cheltenham, UK:  Edward Elgar, 2007, Chapter 25, pp. 393-416.  Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186563 or https://rdcu.be/dcJxl.

——————————————————————————————————

  • “Telecommuting”, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian and Ilan Salomon.  Entry in  A Dictionary of Transport Analysis, eds. Kenneth Button, Henry Vega, and Peter Nijkamp, Cheltenham, UK:  Edward Elgar, 2011.
  • Impacts of Home-Based Telecommuting on Vehicle-Miles Traveled:  A Nationwide Time Series Analysis“, by Sangho Choo, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Ilan Salomon.  Report prepared for the California Energy Commission, September 2002.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-02-05, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=308.
  • “At Issue:  Will Encouraging Telecommuting Decrease Traffic Congestion?”  (The ‘No’ Response), by Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  The CQ (Congressional Quarterly) Researcher 8(30) (August 14), 1998, 713.
  • “An Empirical Analysis of the Transportation Impacts of Telecommuting“, by P. L. Mokhtarian.  Pro­ceedings (Vol. 1), 6th International Conference on Travel Behavior, Quebec City, Quebec, May 22-24, 1991.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=974.
  • “Technical Memo 2: Travel and Energy Impacts of Telecommuting“, by S. Handy and P. L. Mokhtarian, prepared for the California Energy Commission. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-93-15, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, August 1993.
  • “Travel Diary-Based Emissions Analysis of Telecommuting for the Puget Sound Demonstration Project“, by Dennis K. Henderson, Brett E. Koenig, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. Prepared for the Washington State Energy Office. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-94-26, November 1994.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=766.
  • “Residential Area-Based Offices Project: Interim Findings Report on the Evaluation of Impacts“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Prashant N. Balepur, Michelle Derr, Chaang-Iuan Ho, David M. Stanek, and Krishna Varma. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration and the California Department of Transportation Office of Traffic Improvement. Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-96-11, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, November 1996.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=616.
  • “An Evaluation of Telecommuting as a Trip Reduction Measure“, by R. Kitamura, P. Mokhtarian, R. Pendyala, and K. Goulias. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Planning and Transport Research and Computation (PTRC), Education and Research Services Limited, University of Sussex, Brighton, England, September 1991, 69-80 (abstract refereed).  Available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1096f8wt.
  • “Guest editorial“, Transportation 18(4), Special Issue on Telecommunications and Travel Behavior. 1991.
  • “Telecommuting: What’s the Payoff?” Access (a publication of the University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkeley), Spring 1993.  Available at https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2vv4q99p.
  • “Evaluation Report: Telecommuting Pilot Project”, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Tom Brady, Kathy Yates, Waldo Lopez, and Nedra Bickel. Southern California Association of Governments and the Central City Association. Los Angeles, August 1988.

2.3  Residential Location Impacts of Teleworking

  • “The Seoul of Alonso: New Perspectives on Telecommuting and Residential Location from South Korea”, by Seung-Nam Kim, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Kun-Hyuck Ahn.  Urban Geography 33(8), 2012, 1163-1191.
  • “Does Telecommuting Really Save Commute Time?  Time, Distance, and Speed Evidence from State of California Workers”, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. Chapter 15 in Tanja van der Lippe and Pascale Peters, eds., Competing Claims in Work and Family Life.  Cheltenham, UK:  Edward Elgar, 2007, 249-267.
  • “Which Came First, the Telecommuting or the Residential Relocation?  An Empirical Analysis of Causality“, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Urban Geography 27(7), 2006, 590-609.
  • “Telecommuting, Residential Location, and Commute Distance Traveled:  Evidence from State of California Employees“, by Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Gustavo O. Collantes, and Carsten Gertz.  Environment and Planning A 36, 2004, 1877-1897.  An abridged version appears in Dieter Hassen­pflug and Gudrun Tegeder, eds., City.net:  Cities in the Age of Telecommunications.  Marburg, Germany:  Tectum Verlag, pp. 127-148.
  • “Telecommuting and Residential Location:  Theory and Implications for Commute Travel in the Monocentric Metropolis“, by Jay R. Lund and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Trans­por­tation Research Record 1463, 1994, 10-14.

——————————————————————————————————

  • “The Impact of Telecommuting on the Commute Time, Distance, and Speed of State of California Workers“, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-05-23, Institute of Trans­por­tation Studies, University of California, Davis, 2005. Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=66.
  • “An Empirical Analysis of Causality in the Relationship between Telecommuting and Residential and Job Relocation“, by David T. Ory and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-05-03, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, February 2005.
    Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=45.
  • “Telecommuting and Residential Location:  Relationships with Commute Distance Traveled for State of California Workers“, by Gustavo O. Collantes and Patricia L. Mokh­tarian.  Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-03-16, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, December, 2003.  Available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=272.
  • “Endbericht:  Die Langfristigen Auswirkungen von Telearbeit auf das Verkehrsverhalten und Umzugsentscheidungen (The Long-Term Effects of Telecommuting on Travel Behavior and Residential Location)”, by Carsten Gertz and Patricia L. Mokhtarian.  Report to BMW AG, Verkehrskonzepte Munchen, Germany, July 1999 (in German).

2.4  Cost-benefit Analysis of Teleworking

  • “Costs and Benefits of Home-Based Telecommuting: A Monte Carlo Simulation Model Incorporating Telecommuter, Employer, and Public Sector Perspectives“, by Kevan Shafizadeh, Debbie A. Niemeier, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Ilan Salomon.  ASCE Journal of Infra­structure Systems 13(1) (March), 2007, 12-25.  Available at https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%291076-0342%282007%2913%3A1%2812%29.

——————————————————————————————————-

  • “The Costs and Benefits of Home-Based Telecommuting“, by Kevan Shafizadeh, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Debbie A. Niemeier, and Ilan Salomon.  California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2000-20, prepared for Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California, under MOU 278, October 2000.  UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-00-23, available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1755.
  • “The Costs and Benefits of Telecommuting:  A Review and Evaluation of Micro-Scale Studies and Promotional Literature“, by Kevan Shafizadeh, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, Debbie A. Niemeier, and Ilan Salomon.  California PATH Research Report UCB-ITS-PRR-2000-13, prepared for Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California, under MOU 278, August 2000.  UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-00-24, available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/download_pdf.php?id=1757.
  • “The Costs and Benefits of Telecommuting:  An Evaluation of Macro-Scale Literature“, by Kevan Shafizadeh, Debbie A. Niemeier, Patricia L. Mokhtarian, and Ilan Salomon.  California PATH Working Paper UCB-ITS-PWP-98-5, prepared for Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California, under MOU 278, February 1998.  UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies Research Report UCD-ITS-RR-97-23, available at https://itspubs.ucdavis.edu/publication_detail.php?id=552.